Fact check: Little evidence of postal vote fraud in the UK

Reform UK’s “contract”, released on June 17, included a section on reforming the absent voting system, saying “postal voting has allowed electoral fraud”.

Evaluation

Convictions for postal vote fraud are rare in the UK, and there have been only two in the last five years – both in local elections.

The Electoral Commission says there “is no evidence of large-scale electoral fraud” in the UK over the past five years.

The facts

In its manifesto – or what Reform UK calls its “contract” – released on June 17, the Constitutional Reform section includes a pledge to “Commence Reform of the Postal Voting System”.

It also says that “postal voting has allowed electoral fraud”, pledging to abolish the postal vote for everyone except “the elderly, disabled or those who can’t leave their homes”.

Postal votes have been available on demand since February 2001 in Great Britain. Prior to then, voters had to give a reason for applying for an absent vote, or provide evidence from their doctor or employer giving a reason why they could not attend a polling station.

Since postal voting was opened up to all voters, its popularity has exploded: from 4.9% of valid votes in the 2001 General Election (the first under the new rules) to 21.0% in 2019 – representing 6.7 million votes.

In 2019, there were no convictions for postal fraud in the General Election. There was one conviction for electoral fraud otherwise, involving ballot papers in Greenwich being tampered with.

According to the Electoral Commission, there is no evidence of large-scale electoral fraud in the last five years. Of 1,462 cases of alleged electoral fraud reported to police between 2019 and 2023, 11 led to convictions and police issued four cautions.

Postal vote fraud accounted for two of the convictions across that period: one in Derby in 2019, and one in Barnet in 2022, both during local elections.